lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161028182250.df6p6setaauxsezu@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:22:50 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     ahaslam@...libre.com
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, khilman@...libre.com, nsekhar@...com,
        david@...hnology.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] regulator: core: Add over current changed event

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:00:52PM +0200, ahaslam@...libre.com wrote:
> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
> 
> Regulator consumers may be interested to know when the
> over current condition is over.
> 
> Add an over currerent "changed" event. The registered useres
> for this event can then check the over current flag to know
> the status of the over current condition.

Would a more general event for error conditions work as well?  Thinking
about this I'm unclear how interested consumers are going to be in the
specific error condition as opposed to the fact that the regulator ran
into trouble, and I can imagine that some regulators will report the
same root cause differently - another regulator might detect an
excessive current draw by seeing the output voltage collapse and the
regulator go out of regulation for example.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ