linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] arm64: Add support for CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8GjehaCrKv2CQbPRg_r6mK3vtFnsuHAJyDkS2n8STEkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:39:45 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] arm64: Add support for CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL

On 28 October 2016 at 23:07, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..6c271e2
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/physaddr.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <asm/memory.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +unsigned long __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    phys_addr_t __x = (phys_addr_t)x;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (__x & BIT(VA_BITS - 1)) {
>>>> +        /* The bit check ensures this is the right range */
>>>> +        return (__x & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET;
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +        VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(x < kimage_vaddr || x > (unsigned long)_end);
>>>
>>>
>>> IIUC, in (3) you were asking if the last check should be '>' or '>='?
>>>
>>> To match high_memory, I suspect the latter, as _end doesn't fall within
>>> the mapped virtual address space.
>>>
>>
>> I was actually concerned about if _end would be correct with KASLR.
>> Ard confirmed that it gets fixed up to be correct. I'll change the
>> check to check for >=.
>>
>
> While testing this, I found two places with __pa(_end) to get bounds,
> one in arm64 code and one in memblock code. x86 gets away with this
> because memblock is actually __pa_symbol and x86 does image placement
> different and can check against the maximum image size. I think
> including _end in __pa_symbol but excluding it from the generic
> __virt_to_phys makes sense. It's a bit nicer than doing _end - 1 +
> 1 everywhere.
>

Could we redefine __pa_symbol() under CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL to
something that checks (x >= kimage_vaddr + TEXT_OFFSET || x <=
(unsigned long)_end), i.e., reject linear virtual addresses? (Assuming
my understanding of the meaning of __pa_symbol() is correct)