[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdabSP47+OA5bVwYhqMBvqKGxxG8=Vk94KcdAmkqjsi2pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:08:53 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
> allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
> account.
>
> Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists