[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR02MB1683D9227A1B244B19A30E4281AC0@BLUPR02MB1683.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:12:38 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        "grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
        "James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com" 
        <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra
 scheduler
On 10/28/16 22:38, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Then, assuming that this solution may be of general interest, and that
> BFQ benefits convinced you a little bit too, may I get significant
> collaboration/help on implementing this infrastructure?  If so, Jens
> and all possibly interested parties, could we have a sort of short
> kick-off technical meeting during KS/LPC?
Hello Paolo and Jens,
Please keep me in the loop for any communication about BFQ / blk-mq 
scheduling. My employer was so kind to allow me to spend some of my time 
to work on this. I plan to attend the KS.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
