linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 044/125] uio: fix dmem_region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161029134949.037157779@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:49:22 -0400
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Viktorin <viktorin@...ivetech.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 044/125] uio: fix dmem_region_start computation

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@...ivetech.com>

commit 4d31a2588ae37a5d0f61f4d956454e9504846aeb upstream.

The variable i contains a total number of resources (including
IORESOURCE_IRQ). However, we want the dmem_region_start to point
after the last resource of type IORESOURCE_MEM. The original behaviour
leads (very likely) to skipping several UIO mapping regions and makes
them useless. Fix this by computing dmem_region_start from the uiomem
which points to the last used UIO mapping.

Fixes: 0a0c3b5a24bd ("Add new uio device for dynamic memory allocation")

Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@...ivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c
+++ b/drivers/uio/uio_dmem_genirq.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int uio_dmem_genirq_probe(struct
 		++uiomem;
 	}
 
-	priv->dmem_region_start = i;
+	priv->dmem_region_start = uiomem - &uioinfo->mem[0];
 	priv->num_dmem_regions = pdata->num_dynamic_regions;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_dynamic_regions; ++i) {