linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 34/51] ASoC: dapm: Fix possible uninitialized variable in snd_soc_dapm_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161029134923.972741813@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:49:35 -0400
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 34/51] ASoC: dapm: Fix possible uninitialized variable in snd_soc_dapm_get_volsw()

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>

commit 01ad5e7de67b408d9b48b437b06a9938ddf460b5 upstream.

If soc_dapm_read() fails, val will be uninitialized, and bogus values
will be written later:

	ret = soc_dapm_read(dapm, reg, &val);
	val = (val >> shift) & mask;

However, the compiler does not give a warning. Return on error before
val is really used to avoid this.

This is similar to the commit 6912831623c5 ("ASoC: dapm: Fix
uninitialized variable in snd_soc_dapm_get_enum_double()")

Fixes: ce0fc93ae56e (ASoC: Add DAPM support at the component level)
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 sound/soc/soc-dapm.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3015,6 +3015,9 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_get_volsw(struct snd_kc
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
 
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (invert)
 		ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = max - val;
 	else