linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f749da5-121c-6e83-7e32-ce79cddb89a7@netscape.net>
Date:   Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:08:27 +0200
From:   Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...scape.net>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra
 scheduler

Hey, people,
don't you annoy yourselves all the time?
The BFQ patches provide a useful alternative for the code called 
"legacy" by you, while you're not maintaining the base any more, 
and just about to invent something new, again. ?!
When blk-mq has no scheduler -> work on it. When you want to 
develop I/O scheduler APIs -> work on it. Maybe you even want to 
collaborate with someone, who already has a working solution, 
meaning Paolo Valente +team, with BFQ. Too much for you?

I don't see any progress with your blk-mq work since years, while 
Paolo Valente continuously improves and maintains the BFQ.

I need to be a little impolite on here: Several blk maintainers 
behave as masters of the universe, just to keep up their own 
view/ claim. That's a real shame for all Linux.

Best regards,
Manuel Krause