[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c16d6b6c-608e-c711-cc18-34b8d0082183@gruss.cc>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 23:49:57 +0200
From: Daniel Gruss <daniel@...ss.cc>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] rowhammer protection [was Re: Getting
interrupt every million cache misses]
On 29.10.2016 23:45, Pavel Machek wrote:
> indy/sandy/haswell/skylake, so I'll just use the generic version...?)
yes, generic might work, but i never tested it on anything that old...
on my system i have >30 bit flips per second (ivy bridge i5-3xxx) with
the rowhammer-ivy test... sometimes even more than 100 per second...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists