[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ceb7dbf-d242-1427-199a-b6ec82876f23@grimberg.me>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:17:57 +0200
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] IB/mlx5: Simplify completion into a wait_event
On 27/10/16 09:59, Binoy Jayan wrote:
> Convert the completion 'mlx5_ib_umr_context:done' to a wait_event as it
> just waits for the return value to be filled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 2 +-
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 9 +++++----
> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> index de31b5f..cf496b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mw {
> struct mlx5_ib_umr_context {
> struct ib_cqe cqe;
> enum ib_wc_status status;
> - struct completion done;
> + wait_queue_head_t wq;
> };
>
> struct umr_common {
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> index dfaf6f6..49ff2af 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> @@ -846,14 +846,14 @@ static void mlx5_ib_umr_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
> container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct mlx5_ib_umr_context, cqe);
>
> context->status = wc->status;
> - complete(&context->done);
> + wake_up(&context->wq);
> }
>
> static inline void mlx5_ib_init_umr_context(struct mlx5_ib_umr_context *context)
> {
> context->cqe.done = mlx5_ib_umr_done;
> - context->status = -1;
> - init_completion(&context->done);
> + context->status = IB_WC_STATUS_NONE;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&context->wq);
> }
>
> static inline int mlx5_ib_post_send_wait(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> @@ -873,7 +873,8 @@ static inline int mlx5_ib_post_send_wait(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> if (err) {
> mlx5_ib_warn(dev, "UMR post send failed, err %d\n", err);
> } else {
> - wait_for_completion(&umr_context.done);
> + wait_event(umr_context.wq,
> + umr_context.status != IB_WC_STATUS_NONE);
How is this simpler?
> enum ib_wc_status {
> + IB_WC_STATUS_NONE = -1,
> IB_WC_SUCCESS,
> IB_WC_LOC_LEN_ERR,
> IB_WC_LOC_QP_OP_ERR,
>
Huh? Where did this bogus status came from? IMHO, this is polluting
the verbs interface for no good reason at all, sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists