[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031122140.GB6774@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 06:21:40 -0600
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make Kconfig text for
DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE stronger
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> > The current state of driver removal is not great.
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE finds lots of errors. The help text
> > currently undersells exactly how many errors this option will find. Add
> > a bit more description to indicate this option shouldn't be turned on
> > unless you actually want to debug driver removal. The text can be
> > changed later when more drivers are fixed up.
>
> Indeed, this is failing miserably for e.g. SoC clock drivers using
> platform_driver_probe(), which are never retried, rendering the complete
> system useless.
Why are they never retried?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists