linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make Kconfig text for DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161031150751.GA3744@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:07:51 -0600
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make Kconfig text for
 DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE stronger

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:07:24AM -0600, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:10:57AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >>> > The current state of driver removal is not great.
> > >>> > CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE finds lots of errors. The help text
> > >>> > currently undersells exactly how many errors this option will find. Add
> > >>> > a bit more description to indicate this option shouldn't be turned on
> > >>> > unless you actually want to debug driver removal. The text can be
> > >>> > changed later when more drivers are fixed up.
> > >>>
> > >>> Indeed, this is failing miserably for e.g. SoC clock drivers using
> > >>> platform_driver_probe(), which are never retried, rendering the complete
> > >>> system useless.
> > >>
> > >> Why are they never retried?
> > >
> > > Because platform_driver_probe() is meant for non-hotpluggable devices,
> > > and unregisters the platform driver immediately if probe fails.
> > > See also the comments for __platform_driver_probe():
> > 
> > My patch "driver core: skip removal test for non-removable drivers"
> > fixes this case. It seems to have dropped from Greg's queue, so I'll
> > resend.
> 
> Odd, I don't see that anywhere here, sorry about that...

Ah, found it, will queue it up now.