[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031162631.GB28817@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:26:31 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Fix stack alignment when processing backtraces
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > -.Ldumpstm: stmfd sp!, {instr, reg, stack, r7, lr}
> > + /* Must maintain 8 byte stack alignment */
> > +.Ldumpstm: stmfd sp!, {r3, instr, reg, stack, r7, lr}
> > mov stack, r0
> > mov instr, r1
> > mov reg, #10
> > @@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
> > teq r7, #0
> > adrne r0, .Lcr
> > blne printk
> > - ldmfd sp!, {instr, reg, stack, r7, pc}
> > + ldmfd sp!, {r3, instr, reg, stack, r7, pc}
>
> I'd prefer r8 to get used rather than r3, as it makes it look like
> r3 is somehow required to be preserved when that's not the case.
> Makes the code slightly more difficult to understand.
Sure, I will change that and send it to your tracker.
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists