lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35bde193-8492-83e0-fb03-8385d8afd007@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:51:40 -0700
From:   Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clocksource: Add clockevent support to NPS400
 driver

Hi Daniel,

On 10/31/2016 10:03 AM, Noam Camus wrote:
>> Oops, wait. Here, arch/arc/kernel/time.c should be moved in drivers/clocksource and consolidated with this driver.
>> >Very likely, CPUHP_AP_ARC_TIMER_STARTING can be used for all ARC timers.
> Indeed the ARC timer driver served as my inspiration but due to HW threads handling they are not the same.
> Moving drivers from arch/arc to driver/clocksource is not my call (Vineet Gupta is the maintainer of ARC)
> And I think they quiet differ now so consolidation gain is not obvious.

Sorry this was on my todo list at low priority. Anyways took a quick look at it now.

The problem is timer code overlaps pure driver land and ARC specific code. e.g.
CONFIG_ARC_HAS_RTC clocksource needs to check whether hardware exists or not. We
currently conveniently check that from cpuinfo populated at boot time. Now either
I need to export that info as a function (which should be done anyways) - but then
define stub for !ARC. Either that or duplicate the detection code here (orig copy
in arc setup.c)

So doing this exercise cleanly would mean exporting much of
arch/arc/include/asm/{arcregs.h, mcip.h} out of ARC into include/soc/arc/*. Isn't
this kind of going back to include/asm-<arch>/* days ?

Honestly I do want to move the driver in the right place but not sure how to do
this cleanly.

Thoughts ?

-Vineet

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ