[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031013848.4vi2544tb5cs65nk@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:38:48 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson@...adcom.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <oza@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Document Broadcom OTP controller
driver
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:12:02PM -0700, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> From: Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <oza@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Richardson <jonathan.richardson@...adcom.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/brcm,ocotp.txt | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/brcm,ocotp.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/brcm,ocotp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/brcm,ocotp.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6462e12
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/brcm,ocotp.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +Broadcom OTP memory controller
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +- compatible: "brcm,ocotp" for the first generation Broadcom OTPC which is used
> + in Cygnus and supports 32 bit read/write. Use "brcm,ocotp-v2" for the second
> + generation Broadcom OTPC which is used in SoC's such as Stingray and supports
> + 64-bit read/write.
These should be SoC specific. While I'd guess this block is simple
enough, having the SoC can define what all the bits are. Yes, there is a
binding to define those, but you may not use that.
> +- reg: Base address of the OTP controller.
> +- brcm,ocotp-size: Amount of memory available, in 32 bit words
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +otp: otp@...1c800 {
> + compatible = "brcm,ocotp";
> + reg = <0x0301c800 0x2c>;
> + brcm,ocotp-size = <2048>;
> +};
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists