linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1477948607-12899-2-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:16:46 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Cc:     ralf@...ux-mips.org, cernekee@...il.com, jaedon.shin@...il.com,
        justinpopo6@...il.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, marc.zyngier@....com,
        jason@...edaemon.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/bcm7038-l1: Implement irq_cpu_offline

We did not implement an irq_cpu_offline callback for our irqchip, yet we
support setting a given IRQ's affinity. This resulted in interrupts
whose affinity mask included CPUs being taken offline not to work
correctly once the CPU had been put offline.

Fixes: 5f7f0317ed28 ("IRQCHIP: Add new driver for BCM7038-style level 1 interrupt controllers")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
index 0fea985ef1dc..529968ac38c0 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
@@ -216,6 +216,30 @@ static int bcm7038_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct cpumask *mask = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	cpumask_t new_affinity;
+
+	/* This CPU was not on the affinity mask */
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
+		return;
+
+	if (cpumask_weight(mask) > 1) {
+		/* Multiple CPU affinity, remove this CPU from the affinity
+		 * mask
+		 */
+		cpumask_copy(&new_affinity, mask);
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &new_affinity);
+	} else {
+		/* Only CPU, put on the lowest online CPU */
+		cpumask_clear(&new_affinity);
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask), &new_affinity);
+	}
+	irq_set_affinity_locked(d, &new_affinity, false);
+}
+
 static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
 				      unsigned int idx,
 				      struct bcm7038_l1_chip *intc)
@@ -267,6 +291,7 @@ static struct irq_chip bcm7038_l1_irq_chip = {
 	.irq_mask		= bcm7038_l1_mask,
 	.irq_unmask		= bcm7038_l1_unmask,
 	.irq_set_affinity	= bcm7038_l1_set_affinity,
+	.irq_cpu_offline	= bcm7038_l1_cpu_offline,
 };
 
 static int bcm7038_l1_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
-- 
2.7.4