[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031234855.qu64eamohn35jdo4@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 00:48:55 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/fpu: Remove CR0.TS support
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:10:48AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> See https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/lguest/2013-May/002001.html .
> Nobody cared enough to fix it. I cared enough to figure it all out. But
> I didn't understand much of the possible solutions that where suggested
> three years ago.
I'm guessing the simple fix would be this:
---
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/Kconfig b/drivers/lguest/Kconfig
index 169172d2ba05..9c08b3050bb7 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/lguest/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
config LGUEST
tristate "Linux hypervisor example code"
- depends on X86_32 && EVENTFD && TTY && PCI_DIRECT
+ depends on X86_32 && EVENTFD && TTY && PCI_DIRECT && !MICROCODE
select HVC_DRIVER
---help---
This is a very simple module which allows you to run
---
but maybe the better fix is to hack in MSR emulation in lguest and
intercept the *MSR accesses and do the writes/reads in the exception
fixup and ...
I haven't looked at the lguest code, of course and whether that's easily
doable and whether it even makes sense and whether one should simply use
qemu/kvm instead and, and, and...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists