lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 01 Nov 2016 09:18:13 +0100
From:   Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me
> know (simply CC regressions@...mhuis.info).

Do build regressions count?

Because I was trying to fix an obscure build issue in arch/mips, choose
a random configuration that should hit that issue, and promptly ran
into
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<201610301405.K82KqqW0%25fengguang.wu@...el.com>
The same configuration does build under v4.8, I tested that of course.

(Side note: I had to manually insert "25" after "%" to get this to
work. Should Intel fix its mail setup, or should lkml.kernel.org learn
to escape "%"?)

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ