[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477988293.2230.36.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 09:18:13 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me
> know (simply CC regressions@...mhuis.info).
Do build regressions count?
Because I was trying to fix an obscure build issue in arch/mips, choose
a random configuration that should hit that issue, and promptly ran
into
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<201610301405.K82KqqW0%25fengguang.wu@...el.com>
The same configuration does build under v4.8, I tested that of course.
(Side note: I had to manually insert "25" after "%" to get this to
work. Should Intel fix its mail setup, or should lkml.kernel.org learn
to escape "%"?)
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists