[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c90098d4-4d53-d2e1-2d3e-e38e7d548f45@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:52:13 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...rochip.com>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] atmel-isc: release the filehandle if it's not the
only one.
On 01/11/16 09:08, Songjun Wu wrote:
> Release the filehandle in 'isc_open' if it's not the only filehandle
> opened for the associated video_device.
What's wrong with that? You should always be able to open the device
multiple times. v4l2-compliance will fail after this patch. I'm not sure
what you intended to do here, but this patch is wrong.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...rochip.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
> index 8e25d3f..5e08404 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
> @@ -926,21 +926,21 @@ static int isc_open(struct file *file)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto unlock;
>
> - if (!v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file))
> - goto unlock;
> + ret = !v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fh_rel;
>
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
> - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
> - v4l2_fh_release(file);
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
> + goto fh_rel;
>
> ret = isc_set_fmt(isc, &isc->fmt);
> - if (ret) {
> + if (ret)
> v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
> - v4l2_fh_release(file);
> - }
>
> +fh_rel:
> + if (ret)
> + v4l2_fh_release(file);
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&isc->lock);
> return ret;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists