linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] clocksource: update "fn" at CLOCKSOURCE_OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB6PR0501MB251840D45FC427B1A7B7572AAAA10@DB6PR0501MB2518.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:07:38 +0000
From:   Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] clocksource: update "fn" at
 CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE() of nps400 timer

> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de] 
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:40 PM

>>  
>>  static unsigned long nps_timer_rate;
>> +static int nps_get_timer_clk(struct device_node *node,
>
>Please don't glue variables and functions together w/o a new line. That's horrible to read.
Will be fixed in V4

>> +static int __init nps_setup_clocksource(struct device_node *node)
>>  {
>>  	int ret, cluster;
>> +	struct clk *clk;
>>  
>>  	for (cluster = 0; cluster < NPS_CLUSTER_NUM; cluster++)
>>  		nps_msu_reg_low_addr[cluster] =
>>  			nps_host_reg((cluster << NPS_CLUSTER_OFFSET),
>>  				 NPS_MSU_BLKID, NPS_MSU_TICK_LOW);
>>  
>> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>> -	if (ret) {
>> -		pr_err("Couldn't enable parent clock\n");
>> -		return ret;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	nps_timer_rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
>> +	nps_get_timer_clk(node, &nps_timer_rate, clk);

>Why are you ignoring the return code? It was handled before your change ...
Will be fixed in V4

Regards,
Noam