lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161101170636.GA22639@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:06:36 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: block device direct I/O fast path

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> #2 is a bit more problematic, I'm pondering how we can implement that on
> top of the bio approach. The nice thing about the request based approach
> is that we have a 1:1 mapping with the unit on the driver side. And we
> have a place to store the timer. I don't particularly love the embedded
> timer, however, it'd be great to implement that differently. Trying to
> think of options there, haven't found any yet.

I have a couple ideas for that.  Give me a few weeks and I'll send
patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ