| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMJBoFPeMJFiq1ntLnxa2=UJuTUGi0wOg_+z5vdKrDxPjWZiBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:05:20 +0100
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/3] z3fold: change per-pool spinlock to rwlock
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com> wrote:
>> Mapping/unmapping goes with no actual modifications so it makes
>> sense to only take a read lock in map/unmap functions.
>>
>> This change gives up to 10% performance gain and lower latencies
>> in fio sequential read/write tests, e.g. before:
>>
>> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>> WRITE: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=3234.8MB/s, minb=276031KB/s, maxb=277391KB/s, mint=850530msec, maxt=854720msec
>>
>> Run status group 1 (all jobs):
>> READ: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=4838.6MB/s, minb=412888KB/s, maxb=424969KB/s, mint=555168msec, maxt=571412msec
>>
>> after:
>> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>> WRITE: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=3284.2MB/s, minb=280249KB/s, maxb=281130KB/s, mint=839218msec, maxt=841856msec
>>
>> Run status group 1 (all jobs):
>> READ: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=5210.7MB/s, minb=444640KB/s, maxb=447791KB/s, mint=526874msec, maxt=530607msec
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
>> ---
>> mm/z3fold.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
>> index 5ac325a..014d84f 100644
>> --- a/mm/z3fold.c
>> +++ b/mm/z3fold.c
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct z3fold_ops {
>> * pertaining to a particular z3fold pool.
>> */
>> struct z3fold_pool {
>> - spinlock_t lock;
>> + rwlock_t lock;
>> struct list_head unbuddied[NCHUNKS];
>> struct list_head buddied;
>> struct list_head lru;
>> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static struct z3fold_pool *z3fold_create_pool(gfp_t gfp,
>> pool = kzalloc(sizeof(struct z3fold_pool), gfp);
>> if (!pool)
>> return NULL;
>> - spin_lock_init(&pool->lock);
>> + rwlock_init(&pool->lock);
>> for_each_unbuddied_list(i, 0)
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->unbuddied[i]);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->buddied);
>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>> bud = HEADLESS;
>> else {
>> chunks = size_to_chunks(size);
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_lock(&pool->lock);
>>
>> /* First, try to find an unbuddied z3fold page. */
>> zhdr = NULL;
>> @@ -342,14 +342,14 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>> }
>> }
>> bud = FIRST;
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> }
>>
>> /* Couldn't find unbuddied z3fold page, create new one */
>> page = alloc_page(gfp);
>> if (!page)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_lock(&pool->lock);
>> atomic64_inc(&pool->pages_nr);
>> zhdr = init_z3fold_page(page);
>>
>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>> list_add(&page->lru, &pool->lru);
>>
>> *handle = encode_handle(zhdr, bud);
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> struct page *page;
>> enum buddy bud;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_lock(&pool->lock);
>> zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>> page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>>
>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> default:
>> pr_err("%s: unknown bud %d\n", __func__, bud);
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return;
>> }
>> if (is_unbuddied)
>> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>
>> if (test_bit(UNDER_RECLAIM, &page->private)) {
>> /* z3fold page is under reclaim, reclaim will free */
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> atomic64_inc(&pool->unbuddied_nr);
>> }
>>
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>> struct page *page;
>> unsigned long first_handle = 0, middle_handle = 0, last_handle = 0;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_lock(&pool->lock);
>
> this needs the write lock, as we actually change the pool's lists
> inside the for loop below, e.g.:
>
> page = list_last_entry(&pool->lru, struct page, lru);
> list_del(&page->lru);
>
> as well as:
>
> list_del(&zhdr->buddy);
>
Oh right, thanks. FWIW changing the lock there doesn't seem to have
any impact on fio results anyway.
>> if (!pool->ops || !pool->ops->evict || list_empty(&pool->lru) ||
>> retries == 0) {
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> for (i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
>> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>> last_handle = middle_handle = 0;
>> }
>>
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>
>> /* Issue the eviction callback(s) */
>> if (middle_handle) {
>> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>> goto next;
>> }
>> next:
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_lock(&pool->lock);
>> clear_bit(UNDER_RECLAIM, &page->private);
>> if ((test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private) && ret == 0) ||
>> (zhdr->first_chunks == 0 && zhdr->last_chunks == 0 &&
>> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>> clear_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private);
>> free_z3fold_page(zhdr);
>> atomic64_dec(&pool->pages_nr);
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return 0;
>> } else if (!test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private)) {
>> if (zhdr->first_chunks != 0 &&
>> @@ -607,8 +607,10 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>
>> /* add to beginning of LRU */
>> list_add(&page->lru, &pool->lru);
>> + write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_lock(&pool->lock);
>> }
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -629,7 +631,7 @@ static void *z3fold_map(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> void *addr;
>> enum buddy buddy;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_lock(&pool->lock);
>> zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>> addr = zhdr;
>> page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>> @@ -656,7 +658,7 @@ static void *z3fold_map(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> break;
>> }
>> out:
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return addr;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -671,19 +673,19 @@ static void z3fold_unmap(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>> struct page *page;
>> enum buddy buddy;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_lock(&pool->lock);
>> zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>> page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>>
>> if (test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private)) {
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> buddy = handle_to_buddy(handle);
>> if (buddy == MIDDLE)
>> clear_bit(MIDDLE_CHUNK_MAPPED, &page->private);
>> - spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> + read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 2.4.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists