linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] media: Driver for Toshiba et8ek8 5MP sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:14:01 +0200
From:   Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, sre@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
        mchehab@....samsung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: Driver for Toshiba et8ek8 5MP sensor



On  1.11.2016 22:11, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Ivaylo,
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On  1.11.2016 00:54, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, this answered half of my questions already. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> :-).
>>>>
>>>> I'll have to go through the patches, et8ek8 driver is probably not
>>>> enough to get useful video. platform/video-bus-switch.c is needed for
>>>> camera switching, then some omap3isp patches to bind flash and
>>>> autofocus into the subdevice.
>>>>
>>>> Then, device tree support on n900 can be added.
>>>
>>> I briefly discussed with with Sebastian.
>>>
>>> Do you think the elusive support for the secondary camera is worth keeping
>>> out the main camera from the DT in mainline? As long as there's a reasonable
>>> way to get it working, I'd just merge that. If someone ever gets the
>>> secondary camera working properly and nicely with the video bus switch,
>>> that's cool, we'll somehow deal with the problem then. But frankly I don't
>>> think it's very useful even if we get there: the quality is really bad.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, lets merge what we have till now, it will be way easier to improve on
>> it once it is part of the mainline.
>>
>> BTW, I have (had) patched VBS working almost without problems, when it comes
>> to it I'll dig it.
>
> I wonder if I'm the only one who wonders what VBS is here. Don't tell me its
> the old MS thing. :-) ;-)
>

Oh, sorry, I thought that V(ideo) B(us) S(witch) is clear in the context :)