[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161031225142.1f1900bc@vela.lan>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:51:42 -0600
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: make pdfdocs fails with v4.9-rc3
Em Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:41:48 -0600
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org> escreveu:
> Em Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:40:02 -0600
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org> escreveu:
>
> > Em Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:04:42 -0700
> > Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > > <mchehab@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > Em Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:17:59 -0600
> > > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org> escreveu:
> > > >
> > > >> Em Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:15:24 -0600
> > > >> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
> > > >>
> > > >> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:51:20 -0700
> > > >> > Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Running make pdfdocs on a Ubuntu 16.04 system fails with
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Makefile:58: recipe for target 'media.pdf' failed
> > > >> > > make[2]: *** [media.pdf] Error 1
> > > >> > > Documentation/Makefile.sphinx:79: recipe for target 'pdfdocs' failed
> > > >> > > make[1]: *** [pdfdocs] Error 2
> > > >> > > Makefile:1442: recipe for target 'pdfdocs' failed
> > > >> > > make: *** [pdfdocs] Error 2
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It's not clear from the voluminous (>5MB) output from make pdfdocs
> > > >> > > exactly which stage is failing, and there are some pdf files produced
> > > >> > > in output/latex.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hmm, so it does. It comes down to this:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ! LaTeX Error: \DUrole undefined.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
> > > >> > Type H <return> for immediate help.
> > > >> > ...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > l.195 \renewcommand*{\DUrole}
> > > >> > [2]{ #2 }
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Where the offending command is in Documentation/media/index.rst. Mauro,
> > > >> > got an idea for what's going on there?
> > > >>
> > > >> Sphinx is really a poor solution when it comes to PDF output. In this
> > > >> specific case, this is meant to fix a problem with cross-references.
> > > >>
> > > >> What happens is that Sphinx 1.4.6 (and later?) define reference names without
> > > >> being properly escaped. So, for some references, it causes the PDF output
> > > >> to crash. That happens at one of the DVB header files, if I remember well.
> > > >>
> > > >> This commit restores the sphinx 1.2.x behavior:
> > > >>
> > > >> commit e61a39baf74dddb6cd236147bd19b55c10188d78
> > > >> Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
> > > >> Date: Sun Aug 21 15:14:57 2016 -0300
> > > >>
> > > >> [media] index.rst: Fix LaTeX error in interactive mode on Sphinx 1.4.x
> > > >>
> > > >> The Sphinx 1.4.x definition for \DUrole is:
> > > >>
> > > >> \providecommand*{\DUrole}[2]{%
> > > >> \ifcsname DUrole#1\endcsname%
> > > >> \csname DUrole#1\endcsname{#2}%
> > > >> \else% backwards compatibility: try \docutilsrole#1{#2}
> > > >> \ifcsname docutilsrole#1\endcsname%
> > > >> \csname docutilsrole#1\endcsname{#2}%
> > > >> \else%
> > > >> #2%
> > > >> \fi%
> > > >> \fi%
> > > >> }
> > > >>
> > > >> This is broken when it is used inside a \begin{alltt} block.
> > > >> So, replace it by just "#2", as this won't cause troubles, and
> > > >> it is one of the fallback methods for it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> At the time I tested, it worked fine, but maybe it is redefining the
> > > >> \DUrole too late.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe we could move it to LaTeX preamble instead. Please check if this
> > > >> untested patch fixes the issue.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this seems to be the case. The patch below should fix it.
> > > >
> > > > [PATCH] docs-rst: fix PDF build errors
> > > >
> > > > PDF build on Kernel 4.9-rc? returns an error. This is
> > > > because we're re-defining a command too late. Move
> > > > such redefinition to LaTeX preamble.
> > > >
> > > > Tested by building the documentation on interactive mode:
> > > > make PDFLATEX=xelatex -C Documentation/output/./latex
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: e61a39baf74d ("[media] index.rst: Fix LaTeX error in interactive mode on Sphinx 1.4.x")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/conf.py b/Documentation/conf.py
> > > > index d9bad21dd427..d9ebfeb431a9 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/conf.py
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/conf.py
> > > > @@ -329,6 +329,9 @@ latex_elements = {
> > > > % To allow adjusting table sizes
> > > > \\usepackage{adjustbox}
> > > >
> > > > + % Fix reference escape troubles with Sphinx 1.4.x
> > > > + \\renewcommand*{\\DUrole}[2]{ #2 }
> > > > +
> > > > '''
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/media/index.rst b/Documentation/media/index.rst
> > > > index e347a3e7bdef..7f8f0af620ce 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/media/index.rst
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/media/index.rst
> > > > @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@
> > > > Linux Media Subsystem Documentation
> > > > ===================================
> > > >
> > > > -.. Sphinx 1.4.x has a definition for DUrole that doesn't work on alltt blocks
> > > > -.. raw:: latex
> > > > -
> > > > - \renewcommand*{\DUrole}[2]{ #2 }
> > > > -
> > > > Contents:
> > > >
> > > > .. toctree::
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Mauro
> > >
> > > After applying the patch I'm seeing a similar error message
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > Running Sphinx v1.3.1
> > > [...]
> >
> > Ah! you're running version 1.3.1...
> >
> > We should likely add some logic at conf.py to only enable this on
> > Sphinx 1.4.x...
>
> Could you please apply just the hook that remove the index.rst
> raw LaTeX command and see if it will build fine in interactive
> mode?
>
> Cheers,
> Mauro
I'm not a python programmer, but, after playing with conf.py for a while,
I guess that the following patch should do the right thing applying the
LaTeX fix only for Sphinx 1.4.x.
---
[PATCH v2] docs-rst: fix PDF build errors
PDF build on Kernel 4.9-rc? returns an error. This is
because we're re-defining a command too late. Move
such redefinition to LaTeX preamble.
Tested by building the documentation on interactive mode:
make PDFLATEX=xelatex -C Documentation/output/./latex
Fixes: e61a39baf74d ("[media] index.rst: Fix LaTeX error in interactive mode on Sphinx 1.4.x")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/conf.py b/Documentation/conf.py
index d9bad21dd427..375b61c25df2 100644
--- a/Documentation/conf.py
+++ b/Documentation/conf.py
@@ -332,6 +332,10 @@ latex_elements = {
'''
}
+# Fix reference escape troubles with Sphinx 1.4.x
+if minor > 3:
+ latex_elements['preamble'] += '\\renewcommand*{\\DUrole}[2]{ #2 }'
+
# Grouping the document tree into LaTeX files. List of tuples
# (source start file, target name, title,
# author, documentclass [howto, manual, or own class]).
diff --git a/Documentation/media/index.rst b/Documentation/media/index.rst
index e347a3e7bdef..7f8f0af620ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/media/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/media/index.rst
@@ -1,11 +1,6 @@
Linux Media Subsystem Documentation
===================================
-.. Sphinx 1.4.x has a definition for DUrole that doesn't work on alltt blocks
-.. raw:: latex
-
- \renewcommand*{\DUrole}[2]{ #2 }
-
Contents:
.. toctree::
Cheers,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists