[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161102002228.GC16026@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:22:29 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, dan.carpenter@...cle.com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: keystone: Fix an error checking
On 10/24, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> clk_register_pll() can return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) so checking the return value
> against NULL only is not correct.
The code just doesn't propagate the error up to the caller.
Instead the caller treats NULL as an error and non-NULL as valid.
If the callee detects an error it hides it and returns NULL.
> In order to fix it, update clk_register_pll() to always return an error
> pointer in case of error and check the return value with IS_ERR.
>
> While at it, also fix a tab vs space in the surrounding code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-compiled and un-tested.
Please at least compile test patches.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists