[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161102164150.GA10528@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:41:50 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: cov@...eaurora.org
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com, arnd@...db.de, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
jchandra@...adcom.com, dhdang@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
wangyijing@...wei.com, msalter@...hat.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, jcm@...hat.com,
andrea.gallo@...aro.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
liudongdong3@...wei.com, gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] PCI: QDF2432 32 bit config space accessors
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:08:20AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 07:06:31AM -0600, cov@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > On 2016-10-31 15:48, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:38:05PM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > >>The Qualcomm Technologies QDF2432 SoC does not support accesses
> > >>smaller
> > >>than 32 bits to the PCI configuration space. Register the appropriate
> > >>quirk.
> > >>
> > >>Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
> > >
> > >Hi Christopher,
> > >
> > >Can you rebase this against v4.9-rc1? It no longer applies to my tree.
> >
> > I apologize for not being clearer. This patch depends on:
> >
> > PCI/ACPI: Extend pci_mcfg_lookup() responsibilities
> > PCI/ACPI: Check platform-specific ECAM quirks
> >
> > These patches from Tomasz Nowicki were previously in your pci/ecam-v6
> > branch, but that seems to have come and gone. How would you like to
> > proceed?
>
> Oh yes, that's right, I forgot that connection. I'm afraid I kind of
> dropped the ball on that thread, so I went back and read through it
> again.
>
> I *think* the current state is:
>
> - I'm OK with the first two patches that add the quirk
> infrastructure.
>
> - My issue with the last three patches that add ThunderX quirks is
> that there's no generic description of the ECAM address space.
>
> So if I understand correctly, your Qualcomm patch depends only on the
> first two patches.
I put those first two patches and yours on pci/ecam-v6 and pushed it
again, so you can check it out.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists