linux-kernel - Re: scripts/basic/bin2c: Complete error handling in main()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNASJiV0T-ruC6mLMzaHKzUDo2rFp0h1H1dQXjGk+wUzc5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:26:56 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scripts/basic/bin2c: Complete error handling in main()

2016-11-03 2:48 GMT+09:00 SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>:
>> Is replacing printf("\"\n") with puts("\"") optimization?
>
> Is the difference relevant if an “ordinary” string is passed instead of
> a format string?

I think GCC does the replacement automatically
unless -ffreestanding option is given.


With a quick test, I got the following disassembly

0000000000400440 <main>:
  400440: 48 83 ec 08           sub    $0x8,%rsp
  400444: bf c4 05 40 00       mov    $0x4005c4,%edi
  400449: e8 c2 ff ff ff       callq  400410 <puts@plt>
  40044e: 31 c0                 xor    %eax,%eax
  400450: 48 83 c4 08           add    $0x8,%rsp
  400454: c3                   retq

from the following program:

int main(void)
{
    printf("hello, world\n");
    return 0;
}




>
>> Frankly, the result of this patch seems extremely unreadable code.
>
> Do you care for more complete error detection and corresponding exception handling
> in this source file?


I like the code as is.

Such error checks and magic numbers are messy.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada