[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161103080412.68240cda@kryten>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:04:12 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, duwe@....de, ast@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, chris@...troguy.com, oss@...error.net,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, oohall@...il.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca,
bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Emulation support for load/store
instructions on LE
Hi Ravi,
> emulate_step() uses a number of underlying kernel functions that were
> initially not enabled for LE. This has been rectified since. So, fix
> emulate_step() for LE for the corresponding instructions.
Thanks. Should this be queued up for stable?
Anton
> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 20 --------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> index 3362299..6ca3b90 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
> @@ -1807,8 +1807,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) goto instr_done;
>
> case LARX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> if (op.ea & (size - 1))
> break; /* can't handle
> misaligned */ err = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1832,8 +1830,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) goto ldst_done;
>
> case STCX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> if (op.ea & (size - 1))
> break; /* can't handle
> misaligned */ err = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1859,8 +1855,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) goto ldst_done;
>
> case LOAD:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> err = read_mem(®s->gpr[op.reg], op.ea, size,
> regs); if (!err) {
> if (op.type & SIGNEXT)
> @@ -1872,8 +1866,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
> case LOAD_FP:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> if (size == 4)
> err = do_fp_load(op.reg, do_lfs, op.ea,
> size, regs); else
> @@ -1882,15 +1874,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> case LOAD_VMX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> err = do_vec_load(op.reg, do_lvx, op.ea & ~0xfUL,
> regs); goto ldst_done;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_VSX
> case LOAD_VSX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> err = do_vsx_load(op.reg, do_lxvd2x, op.ea, regs);
> goto ldst_done;
> #endif
> @@ -1913,8 +1901,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) goto instr_done;
>
> case STORE:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> if ((op.type & UPDATE) && size == sizeof(long) &&
> op.reg == 1 && op.update_reg == 1 &&
> !(regs->msr & MSR_PR) &&
> @@ -1927,8 +1913,6 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
> case STORE_FP:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> if (size == 4)
> err = do_fp_store(op.reg, do_stfs, op.ea,
> size, regs); else
> @@ -1937,15 +1921,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs
> *regs, unsigned int instr) #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> case STORE_VMX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> err = do_vec_store(op.reg, do_stvx, op.ea & ~0xfUL,
> regs); goto ldst_done;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_VSX
> case STORE_VSX:
> - if (regs->msr & MSR_LE)
> - return 0;
> err = do_vsx_store(op.reg, do_stxvd2x, op.ea, regs);
> goto ldst_done;
> #endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists