linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] [media] ir-lirc-codec: don't wait any transmitting time for tx only devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20161102043929.eaf7nlje2cru7nky@gangnam.samsung>
Date:   Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:39:30 +0900
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:     Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Cc:     David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] [media] ir-lirc-codec: don't wait any transmitting
 time for tx only devices

Hi Sean,

> > > Andi, it would be good to know what the use-case for the original change is.
> > 
> > the use case is the ir-spi itself which doesn't need the lirc to
> > perform any waiting on its behalf.
> 
> Here is the crux of the problem: in the ir-spi case no wait will actually 
> happen here, and certainly no "over-wait". The patch below will not change
> behaviour at all.
> 
> In the ir-spi case, "towait" will be 0 and no wait happens.
> 
> I think the code is already in good shape but somehow there is a 
> misunderstanding. Did I miss something?

We can just drop this patch, it's just something small that is
bothering me.

I will send a new patchset without this one.

Thanks,
Andi