linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/34] [media] DaVinci-VPFE-Capture: Improve another size determination in vpfe_enum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f214edb8-0af3-e1f5-8b45-9cfa0537f8b5@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:22:24 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/34] [media] DaVinci-VPFE-Capture: Improve another size
 determination in vpfe_enum_input()

On 12/10/16 16:55, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:33:42 +0200
>
> Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
> index 8314c39..87ee35d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpfe_capture.c
> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int vpfe_enum_input(struct file *file, void *priv,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	sdinfo = &vpfe_dev->cfg->sub_devs[subdev];
> -	memcpy(inp, &sdinfo->inputs[index], sizeof(struct v4l2_input));
> +	memcpy(inp, &sdinfo->inputs[index], sizeof(*inp));

If I am not mistaken this can be written as:

	*inp = sdinfo->inputs[index];

Much better.

Regards,

	Hans

>  	return 0;
>  }
>
>