[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af052add-55c9-d314-3d21-ac32e2cfbb82@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:00:43 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
yang.zhang.wz@...il.com, feng.wu@...el.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry
On 03/11/2016 16:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-11-03 14:30+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 26/10/2016 21:59, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> 2016-10-14 20:21+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> Calling apic_find_highest_irr results in IRR being scanned twice,
>>>> once in vmx_sync_pir_from_irr and once in apic_search_irr. Change
>>>> sync_pir_from_irr to do the RVI write and kvm_apic_update_irr to
>>>> compute the new RVI on the fly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>>
>> Nope, this breaks nested VMX exit on external interrupt. For now I'm
>> testing only patch 1 and will push that one only to kvm/next.
>
> Hm, does it also happen with this change?
Probably not but I wanted to understand why. :)
Paolo
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4b20f7304b9c..6be110e53e9e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
> void (*set_virtual_x2apic_mode)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool set);
> void (*set_apic_access_page_addr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t hpa);
> void (*deliver_posted_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
> - void (*sync_pir_to_irr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> + int (*sync_pir_to_irr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int (*set_tss_addr)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int addr);
> int (*get_tdp_level)(void);
> u64 (*get_mt_mask)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool is_mmio);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f8157a36ab09..ffa541d38343 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -4383,9 +4383,9 @@ static void svm_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
> return;
> }
>
> -static void svm_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static int svm_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return;
> + return -1; // XXX
> }
>
> static void svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index f272ccfddc48..2211e1774733 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8493,17 +8493,15 @@ static void vmx_hwapic_irr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr)
> }
> }
>
> -static void vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> - int max_irr;
>
> if (!pi_test_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
> return;
>
> pi_clear_on(&vmx->pi_desc);
> - max_irr = kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
> - vmx_hwapic_irr_update(vcpu, max_irr);
> + return kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
> }
>
> static void vmx_apicv_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 20d572c18293..e8789f3a9bfd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6675,7 +6675,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * notified with kvm_vcpu_kick.
> */
> if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
> - kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu);
> + kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu));
> }
>
> if (vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE || vcpu->requests
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists