linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+FBu1mnbiPa=fMB8Hgq0iUCdoWGhJKJcBukE4n-iF1+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:05:22 -0600
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Cc:     Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] procfs/tasks: add a simple per-task procfs hidepid= field

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:12:55AM -0600, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@...il.com> wrote:
>> > (Third, rebased submission, since first two submissions yielded no replies.)
>> >
>> > This adds a new per-task hidepid= flag that is honored by procfs when
>> > presenting /proc to the user, in addition to the existing hidepid= mount
>> > option. So far, hidepid= was exclusively a per-pidns setting. Locking
>> > down a set of processes so that they cannot see other user's processes
>> > without affecting the rest of the system thus currently requires
>> > creation of a private PID namespace, with all the complexity it brings,
>> > including maintaining a stub init process as PID 1 and losing the
>> > ability to see processes of the same user on the rest of the system.
> [...]
>> Since this adds a new prctl interface, it's best to Cc linux-arch
>> (which I added now).
>
> Please also CC linux-api for the next iteration, since this is a new
> userspace-facing API.

Oops, thank you. I meant linux-api, not linux-arch. :P

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security