linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove some dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db80cda8-0d26-48cb-7ca6-a61b91b0f3be@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 19:24:33 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Cc:     clm@...com, jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove some dead code

Le 03/11/2016 à 13:43, Tobias Klauser a écrit :
> On 2016-11-01 at 11:26:06 +0100, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>> 'btrfs_iget()' can not return an error pointer, so this test can be
>> removed.
> This descrption does not match what the patch actually does. Shouldn't
> it say "...can not return NULL, so this test can be removed."?
>
You are obviously correct. Cut'n'Paste error while sending other patches.
I will send a V2 with an updated description.

Thanks for the review.

CJ