linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy"
 instead of "clock-freq-min-max"

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property.
> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of
> "clock-freq-min-max".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi     | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts        | 2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts      | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied
separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum
frequency). Is that correct?

Best regards,
Krzysztof