lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161103194716.GC12945@kozik-lap>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:47:16 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     krzk@...nel.org, kgene@...nel.org, javier@....samsung.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jh80.chung@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
        jy0922.shim@...sung.com, inki.dae@...sung.com,
        jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com, beomho.seo@...sung.com,
        jaewon02.kim@...sung.com, human.hwang@...sung.com,
        ideal.song@...sung.com, ingi2.kim@...sung.com,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        s.nawrocki@...sung.com, andi.shyti@...sung.com, chanwoo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for Samsung
 Exynos5433 64bit SoC

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:39:07PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC based on
> Octa-core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53). And Exynos5433 supports
> PSCI (Power State Coordination Interface) v0.1.
> 
> This patch includes following Device Tree node to support Exynos5433 SoC:
> 1. Octa cores for big.LITTLE architecture
> - Cortex-A53 LITTLE Quad-core
> - Cortex-A57 big Quad-core
> - Support PSCI v0.1
> 

Patch looks good to me. The GIC interrupt flags will have to be fixed
someday (e.f. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9336553/) but this may
wait... It is violating the GIC since ancient times so I guess we can
violate it some more till someone will be annoyed enough to fix it. :)

BR,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ