lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a3a4a79-d428-f5d9-87e0-97fd91b75c2a@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 22:05:44 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/34] [media] DaVinci-VPFE-Capture: Improve another size
 determination in vpfe_enum_input()

>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int vpfe_enum_input(struct file *file, void *priv,
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>      sdinfo = &vpfe_dev->cfg->sub_devs[subdev];
>> -    memcpy(inp, &sdinfo->inputs[index], sizeof(struct v4l2_input));
>> +    memcpy(inp, &sdinfo->inputs[index], sizeof(*inp));
> 
> If I am not mistaken this can be written as:
> 
>     *inp = sdinfo->inputs[index];
> 
> Much better.

At which position would you like to integrate a second approach for such a change
from this patch series?

* Do you expect me to send a "V2" for the whole series?

* Will an update step be appropriate if I would rebase it on other
  recently accepted suggestions?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ