linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161103221308.GO1859@mai>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:13:08 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option
 (64-bit timers)

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:37PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> The original distinction was done as they were deveoped at different

s/deveoped/developed/

> times and primarily becuse they are specific to UP (RTC) and SMP (GFRC).

s/becuse/because/

> 
> But given that driver now handles that at runtime, (i.e. not allowing
> RTC as clocksource in SMP), we can simplify things a bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> ---