lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA07jV8BUGMMtP=3PQLaL887UOd2wWa8ALyPqr=pdDdbGErGig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:40:52 -0700
From:   Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@...il.com>
To:     Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] remoteproc: Add a sysfs interface for firmware and state

HI Matt,

Thanks for your patch. I am trying it.

Please see my questions inline.

Thanks,
Wendy

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com> wrote:
> This patch adds a sysfs interface to rproc allowing the firmware name
> and processor state to be changed dynamically.
>
> State was previously available in debugfs, and is replicated here. The
> firmware file allows retrieval of the running firmware name, and a new
> one to be specified at run time, so long as the remote processor has
> been stopped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> Drop call to rproc_add_virtio_devices from sysfs firmware_store
> Use strcspn to find firmware name length
> Explicit indexes for state strings
>
> Changes in v2:
> Have firmware_store perform the necessary steps inline.
> Use sysfs_streq when dealing with writes to sysfs files
>
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-remoteproc |  50 ++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                      |   1 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c             |   3 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h         |   5 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c            | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 210 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-remoteproc
>  create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-remoteproc b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-remoteproc
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d188afebc8ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-remoteproc
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +What:          /sys/class/remoteproc/.../firmware
> +Date:          October 2016
> +Contact:       Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
> +Description:   Remote processor firmware
> +
> +               Reports the name of the firmware currently loaded to the
> +               remote processor.
> +
> +               To change the running firmware, ensure the remote processor is
> +               stopped (using /sys/class/remoteproc/.../state) and write a new filename.
> +
> +What:          /sys/class/remoteproc/.../state
> +Date:          October 2016
> +Contact:       Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
> +Description:   Remote processor state
> +
> +               Reports the state of the remote processor, which will be one of:
> +
> +               "offline"
> +               "suspended"
> +               "running"
> +               "crashed"
> +               "invalid"
> +
> +               "offline" means the remote processor is powered off.
> +
> +               "suspended" means that the remote processor is suspended and
> +               must be woken to receive messages.
> +
> +               "running" is the normal state of an available remote processor
> +
> +               "crashed" indicates that a problem/crash has been detected on
> +               the remote processor.
> +
> +               "invalid" is returned if the remote processor is in an
> +               unknown state.
> +
> +               Writing this file controls the state of the remote processor.
> +               The following states can be written:
> +
> +               "start"
> +               "stop"
> +
> +               Writing "start" will attempt to start the processor running the
> +               firmware indicated by, or written to,
> +               /sys/class/remoteproc/.../firmware. The remote processor should
> +               transition to "running" state.
> +
> +               Writing "stop" will attempt to halt the remote processor and
> +               return it to the "offline" state.
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index 6dfb62ed643f..6da9b12f9798 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC)               += remoteproc.o
>  remoteproc-y                           := remoteproc_core.o
>  remoteproc-y                           += remoteproc_debugfs.o
> +remoteproc-y                           += remoteproc_sysfs.o
>  remoteproc-y                           += remoteproc_virtio.o
>  remoteproc-y                           += remoteproc_elf_loader.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_REMOTEPROC)          += omap_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index ccc2a73e94dd..b1860949d106 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1347,6 +1347,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>         device_initialize(&rproc->dev);
>         rproc->dev.parent = dev;
>         rproc->dev.type = &rproc_type;
> +       rproc->dev.class = &rproc_class;
>
>         /* Assign a unique device index and name */
>         rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1485,6 +1486,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_report_crash);
>
>  static int __init remoteproc_init(void)
>  {
> +       rproc_init_sysfs();
>         rproc_init_debugfs();
>
>         return 0;
> @@ -1496,6 +1498,7 @@ static void __exit remoteproc_exit(void)
>         ida_destroy(&rproc_dev_index);
>
>         rproc_exit_debugfs();
> +       rproc_exit_sysfs();
>  }
>  module_exit(remoteproc_exit);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 4cf93ca2816e..c2c3e4762b90 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ void rproc_create_debug_dir(struct rproc *rproc);
>  void rproc_init_debugfs(void);
>  void rproc_exit_debugfs(void);
>
> +/* from remoteproc_sysfs.c */
> +extern struct class rproc_class;
> +int rproc_init_sysfs(void);
> +void rproc_exit_sysfs(void);
> +
>  void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring);
>  int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bc5b0e00efb1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/*
> + * Remote Processor Framework
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +
> +#define to_rproc(d) container_of(d, struct rproc, dev)
> +
> +/* Expose the loaded / running firmware name via sysfs */
> +static ssize_t firmware_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                         char *buf)
> +{
> +       struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> +
> +       return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", rproc->firmware);
> +}
> +
> +/* Change firmware name via sysfs */
> +static ssize_t firmware_store(struct device *dev,
> +                             struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                             const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +       struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> +       char *p;
> +       int err, len = count;
> +
> +       err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
> +       if (err) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, err);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "can't change firmware while running\n");
> +               err = -EBUSY;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       len = strcspn(buf, "\n");
> +
> +       p = kstrndup(buf, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!p) {
> +               err = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       kfree(rproc->firmware);
it gives me kernel panic if the initial firmware name is passed from
my remoteproc driver to rproc_alloc()
and it is a const string.
It is better to have another modification to the remoteproc_core.c as
follows in the rproc_alloc().

-       if (!firmware)
+       if (!firmware) {
                /*
                 * Make room for default firmware name (minus %s plus '\0').
                 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
@@ -1332,17 +1346,29 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev,
const char *name,
                 * the caller doesn't pass one).
                 */
                name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
+               p = kmalloc_track_caller(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!p)
+                       return NULL;
+               snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
+       } else {
+               p = kstrndup(firmware, strlen(firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!p) {
+                       return NULL;
+               }
+       }

-       rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(*rproc) + len + name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+       rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(*rproc) + len, GFP_KERNEL);

> +       rproc->firmware = p;
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +
> +       return err ? err : count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(firmware);
> +
> +/*
> + * A state-to-string lookup table, for exposing a human readable state
> + * via sysfs. Always keep in sync with enum rproc_state
> + */
> +static const char * const rproc_state_string[] = {
> +       [RPROC_OFFLINE]         = "offline",
> +       [RPROC_SUSPENDED]       = "suspended",
> +       [RPROC_RUNNING]         = "running",
> +       [RPROC_CRASHED]         = "crashed",
> +       [RPROC_LAST]            = "invalid",
> +};
> +
> +/* Expose the state of the remote processor via sysfs */
> +static ssize_t state_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                         char *buf)
> +{
> +       struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> +       unsigned int state;
> +
> +       state = rproc->state > RPROC_LAST ? RPROC_LAST : rproc->state;
> +       return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", rproc_state_string[state]);
> +}
> +
> +/* Change remote processor state via sysfs */
> +static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
> +                             struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                             const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +       struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +       if (sysfs_streq(buf, "start")) {
> +               if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
> +                       return -EBUSY;
> +
> +               ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
> +       } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "stop")) {
> +               if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               rproc_shutdown(rproc);
The kernel hanged when it was trying to unregister the virtio device
after I tried"stop".
It doesn't look like related to this sysfs API. But just wonder have you seen
similar issue?

> +       } else {
> +               dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +       return ret ? ret : count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(state);
> +
> +static struct attribute *rproc_attrs[] = {
> +       &dev_attr_firmware.attr,
> +       &dev_attr_state.attr,
> +       NULL
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group rproc_devgroup = {
> +       .attrs = rproc_attrs
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *rproc_devgroups[] = {
> +       &rproc_devgroup,
> +       NULL
> +};
> +
> +struct class rproc_class = {
> +       .name           = "remoteproc",
> +       .dev_groups     = rproc_devgroups,
> +};
> +
> +int __init rproc_init_sysfs(void)
> +{
> +       /* create remoteproc device class for sysfs */
> +       int err = class_register(&rproc_class);
> +
> +       if (err)
> +               pr_err("remoteproc: unable to register class\n");
> +       return err;
> +}
> +
> +void __exit rproc_exit_sysfs(void)
> +{
> +       class_unregister(&rproc_class);
> +}
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ