lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 05:37:52 +0000 From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, broonie@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk, morten.rasmussen@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems Hi Catalin, On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > > Otherwise I'm going to: > > > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 > > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9 > > I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have > been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc). > > > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way? > > Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT > for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though. > Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some confusion. I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64 branch with the new version: git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64 Best, - Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists