linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:19:49 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max"

Hi Jaehoon,

Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 19:21:30 CET schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> On 11/04/2016 03:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> >> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property.
> >> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of
> >> "clock-freq-min-max".
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi     | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts        | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts      | 2 +-
> >>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied
> > separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum
> > frequency). Is that correct?
> 
> You're right. I will split the patches. And will resend.
> Thanks!

I think what Krzysztof was asking was just if he can simply pick up this patch 
alone, as it does not require any of the previous changes.

Same is true for the Rockchip patches I guess, so we could just take them 
individually into samsung/rockchip dts branches.


Heiko