[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e993dc5c-7a90-e43b-b761-a70a79b3d1d9@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 13:07:15 +1100
From: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: chris@...troguy.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ast@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oss@...error.net,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, duwe@....de,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca, bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
oohall@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, paulus@...ba.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Emulation support for load/store
instructions on LE
On 03/11/16 21:27, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Yes, kernel-space hw-breakpoint feature is broken on LE without this.
Is there any actual user-visible feature that depends on this, or is
this solely for debugging and development purposes?
It would of course be *nice* to have it in stable trees (particularly so
we pick it up in distros) but I'm not convinced that enabling HW
breakpoints on a platform where it has *never* worked qualifies as an
"actual bug".
(BTW many thanks for fixing this - I had a shot at it late last year but
never quite got there!)
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists