linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv6] support for AD5820 camera auto-focus coil

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161104144936.GG21430@atomide.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2016 07:49:36 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
        pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@....samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6] support for AD5820 camera auto-focus coil

* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> [161104 00:45]:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > I have to admit I mostly use an N9.
> > > 
> > > Well, if you compare that to development on PC, I prefer PC.
> > > 
> > > Even arm development boards are usually easier, as they don't need too
> > > complex userspace, and do have working serial ports.
> > > 
> > > But I do have a serial adapter for N900 now (thanks, sre), so my main
> > > problem now is that N900 takes a lot of time to boot into usable
> > > state.
> > 
> > Yeah... I just upgraded my Debian installation (armel over NFS) a few major
> > numbers and I find it a lot slower than it used to do. I presume that's
> > mostly because of systemd...
> 
> I'm not sure if systemd is to blame. (I'm booting into full GUI...)
> 
> And yes, I noticed the slowdown in Debian 7 -> 8 transition, so I'm
> basically staying at Debian 7 as far as I can.

Maybe it's the armel vs armhf causing the slowdown?

Regards,

Tony