[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY4X8MEUWU4_zuzqT9Vg7d8i236dostABEWFPcK76_w5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 22:41:26 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and
#pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> We can now use generic parser. To support the legacy binding without
> #pinctrl-cells, add pcs_quirk_missing_pinctrl_cells() and warn about
> missing #pinctrl-cells.
>
> Let's also update the documentation for struct pcs_soc_data while at it
> as that seems to be out of date.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Patch applied.
> Looking at some make randconfig results, looks like we don't have
> of_add_property() and of_remove_property() exported. Is there some
> reason not to export them?
If there is too much fuzz from the builders we need to think of something.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists