[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATg9HcwZ95eQC4VG4WMvt4m9gaARC1Z3Dr-U2dCj+JuKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 00:47:32 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blackfin: bf609: let clk_disable() return immediately
if clk is NULL
Hi Steven,
Could you take a look at this patch, please?
2016-09-19 3:03 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Split into per-arch patches
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1
>
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c
> index 3783058..392a59b 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf609/clock.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_enable);
>
> void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> {
> + if (!clk)
> + return;
> +
> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable)
> clk->ops->disable(clk);
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists