[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161106063151.3ef04e9e@kryten>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 06:31:51 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, chris@...troguy.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ast@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oss@...error.net,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, duwe@....de,
lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca, bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
oohall@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, paulus@...ba.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Emulation support for load/store
instructions on LE
Hi,
> kprobe, uprobe, hw-breakpoint and xmon are the only user of
> emulate_step.
>
> Kprobe / uprobe single-steps instruction if they can't emulate it, so
> there is no problem with them. As I mention, hw-breakpoint is broken.
> However I'm not sure about xmon, I need to check that.
I was mostly concerned that it would impact kprobes. Sounds like we are
ok there.
> So yes, there is no user-visible feature that depends on this.
Aren't hardware breakpoints exposed via perf? I'd call perf
user-visible.
Anton
Powered by blists - more mailing lists