lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 21:28:37 +0100 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support On Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:44:33 AM CET Deepa Dinamani wrote: > I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking. > I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now. > > Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t. Won't it already work as expected on 64-bit architectures as they have a 64-bit time_t? Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists