linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5820313A.80207@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:46:02 +0800
From:   Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
To:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        "Laura Abbott" <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <saberlily.xia@...ilicon.com>,
        Zhuangluan Su <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
        Dan Zhao <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA



On 2016/11/7 15:44, Chen Feng wrote:
> On 2016/11/7 15:27, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:08:49PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016/11/7 14:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:58:32PM +0800, Chen Feng wrote:
>>>>> Hello, I hava a question on cma zone.
>>>>>
>>>>> When we have cma zone, cma zone will be the highest zone of system.
>>>>>
>>>>> In android system, the most memory allocator is ION. Media system will
>>>>> alloc unmovable memory from it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On low memory scene, will the CMA zone always do balance?
>>>>
>>>> Allocation request for low zone (normal zone) would not cause CMA zone
>>>> to be balanced since it isn't helpful.
>>>>
>>> Yes. But the cma zone will run out soon. And it always need to do balance.
>>>
>>> How about use migrate cma before movable and let cma type to fallback movable.
>>>
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1263745.html
>>
>> ZONE_CMA approach will act like as your solution. Could you elaborate
>> more on the problem of zone approach?
>>
> 
> The ZONE approach is that makes cma pages in a zone. It can cause a higher swapin/out
> than use migrate cma first.
> 
> The higher swapin/out may have a performance effect to application. The application may
> use too much time swapin memory.
> 
> You can see my tested result attached for detail. And the baseline is result of [1].
> 
> 
My test case is run 60 applications and alloc 512MB ION memory.

Repeat this action 50 times

> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1263745.html
>> Thanks.
>>
>> .
>>