lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161107105342.2ea517bb@vento.lan>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:53:42 -0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org>
Cc:     VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@...teo.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/31] gp8psk: don't do DMA on stack

Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:29:47 +0100
Johannes Stezenbach <js@...uxtv.org> escreveu:

> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:51:14AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
> > I applied this patch to the 4.8.4 kernel driver (that I'm currently
> > running) and it caused nothing but "frontend 0/0 timed out while
> > tuning". Is there another patch that should be used in conjunction
> > with this? If not, this patch breaks the gp8psk driver.
> > 
> > Thanks.  
> 
> Thanks for testing.  "If it's not tested it's broken"...
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:  
> 
> > > index 5d0384dd45b5..fa215ad37f7b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/gp8psk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/gp8psk.c  
> 
> > >  int gp8psk_usb_in_op(struct dvb_usb_device *d, u8 req, u16 value, u16 index, u8 *b, int blen)
> > >  {
> > > +       struct gp8psk_state *st = d->priv;
> > >         int ret = 0,try = 0;
> > >
> > >         if ((ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->usb_mutex)))
> > >                 return ret;
> > >
> > >         while (ret >= 0 && ret != blen && try < 3) {
> > > +               memcpy(st->data, b, blen);
> > >                 ret = usb_control_msg(d->udev,
> > >                         usb_rcvctrlpipe(d->udev,0),
> > >                         req,
> > >                         USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_DIR_IN,
> > > -                       value,index,b,blen,
> > > +                       value, index, st->data, blen,
> > >                         2000);  
> 
> I guess for usb_in the memcpy should be after the usb_control_msg
> and from st->data to b.

Yes, this should fix the issue. Just sent a patch with Johannes
suggestion. Please test.

Regards,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ