[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42c31c00-3b0b-b1e7-46c1-0c849b14dae2@st.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:05:46 +0100
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<andrea.merello@...il.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...inux.com>, <ludovic.barre@...com>,
<olivier.bideau@...com>, <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add PLL_I2S & PLL_SAI for STM32F429/469
boards
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 11/07/2016 02:53 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>>
>> This patch introduces PLL_I2S and PLL_SAI.
>> Vco clock of these PLLs can be modify by DT (only n multiplicator,
>> m divider is still fixed by the boot-loader).
>> Each PLL has 3 dividers. PLL should be off when we modify the rate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 371
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 359 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> index c2661e2..7641acd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > ...
>> +static const struct clk_div_table pll_divp_table[] = {
>> + { 0, 2 }, { 1, 4 }, { 2, 6 }, { 3, 8 },
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Decode current PLL state and (statically) model the state we
>> inherit from
>> * the bootloader.
>> */
>
> This comment isn't right. For a start the model is no longer static.
>
you're right, i will suppress it.
>
>> @@ -615,18 +944,24 @@ struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>> const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
>> const u64 *gates_map;
>> int gates_num;
>> + const struct stm32f4_pll_data *pll_data;
>> + int pll_num;
>
> pll_num is unused.
>
ok
BR
Gabriel
>
> Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists