lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:14:59 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rt@...utronix.de, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] x86/mcheck: Split threshold_cpu_callback into two callbacks On 2016-11-07 16:07:45 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:25:01PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > This moves it 1:1 (well, more or less). Wouldn't you prefer doing it as > > separate patch/change? > > Ontop of all of yours so that you don't have to redo yours? No. It is a separate thing so I would prefer it in a separate patch. However if you are the MCE person in charge here and nobody disagrees I have no problem to suck that into the patch and update remaining queue if necessary. > Thanks. Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists