lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161107160317.jwdbqopivo7g2j2i@black.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:03:17 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 15/41] filemap: handle huge pages in
 do_generic_file_read()

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:01:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:13:05PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > It looks like a huge limitation to me.
> 
> The DAX PMD fault code can live just fine with it.

There's no way out for DAX as we map backing storage directly into
userspace. There's no such limitation for page-cache. And I don't see a
point to introduce such limitation artificially.

Backing storage fragmentation can be a weight on decision whether we want
to allocate huge page, but it shouldn't be show-stopper.

> And without it performance would suck anyway.

It depends on workload, obviously.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ